Vanished Smile Read online

  ALSO BY R. A. SCOTTI

  Basilica: The Splendor and the Scandal—Building St. Peter's

  Sudden Sea: The Great Hurricane of 1938

  Cradle Song

  The Hammer's Eye

  The Devil's Own

  The Kiss of Judas

  For Love of Sarah (as Angelica Scott)

  For my mother and first reader

  who slipped away from her own museum

  August 16, 2007

  The only thing that's important is the legend created by the picture, and not whether it continues to exist itself.

  — PABLO PICASSO

  CONTENTS

  Map

  A Perfect Crime

  The Vanishing Act

  The Hunt

  The Blank Wall

  Not the Usual Suspects

  The Mystery Woman

  A Letter from Leonardo

  The Sting

  A Perfect Story

  The Prisoner

  Acknowledgments

  Notes

  Bibliography

  A PERFECT CRIME

  MONA LISA

  (Courtesy of Erich Lessing/Art Resource, New York)

  I

  ACCORDING TO THE SONG, it's not supposed to rain when it's April in Paris, but the day was wet and raw. I dashed from my hotel room overlooking the Tuileries Gardens, across Rue de Rivoli, and took refuge in the Louvre. There were no ticket lines or tourist groups, and the vastness of the museum swallowed the few visitors, leaving the illusion that I had the whole place to myself. I skipped up the wide front stairs past the Winged Victory, imagining myself Audrey Hepburn in Funny Face.

  The Louvre contains the history of France within its walls—courts, coups, royal weddings, revolution, hangings, and assassination. Henri IV bled to death from the knife of the assassin Ravaillac beneath the frescoed ceiling in the Galerie d'Apollon. The Louvre was a fortress in the Middle Ages, a palace in the monarchy, the people's museum in the Revolution, and Napoleon's showcase in the First Empire. It has stabled horses, sheltered squatters, and served as a printing house, an assignation spot for prostitutes, and studios for artists. David and Fragonard once lived and worked in the area below the Grande Galerie; family wash hung out on clotheslines, heated arguments and cooking flavors filtering up into the galleries. When Napoleon became emperor, he evicted the painters, complaining that one day they would burn down his museum.

  I was wandering through the galleries without a guidebook or floor plan when I came upon Mona Lisa, suddenly, unexpectedly, hanging in the center of one wall. The framed painting was enclosed in a glass box. It was sometime in the late 1970s and there was no special guard or protective rope forcing visitors to keep their distance. On the Louvre wall, she appeared dark, her colors muddy, her attitude aloof. Leonardo wrote that a painter should avoid positioning his subject in the full sun where the light and shadows are strong. She appears different to me now.

  I have been living for months with Mona Lisa, teasing out the answer to a century-old mystery. In my narrow room, framed in a single long window, the shutters open to a slant of northern light, she has the colors of the Tuscan countryside. Her complexion is a soft golden shade. It doesn't matter that she has spent nearly her entire life in France or that the French call her la Joconde and claim her as a national treasure. Mona Lisa is as essentially Italian as Sophia Loren. Seductive yet serenely contained, instantly recognizable yet ever elusive.

  In 2004 and 2005, an international team of specialists assembled at the Louvre to lift Mona Lisa's “veil of mystery.” They analyzed Leonardo's artistry and science using the most sophisticated technology—radiography, 3-D scanners, microfluorescence, infrared reflectography, chemical and gas chromatography of the paint, and more. No work of art has ever undergone such intensive scrutiny. MonaLisa: Inside the Painting presents their analyses, confirming in fascinating and exhaustive detail what the astute art patron Cassiano dal Pozzo wrote in 1625: Mona Lisa “lacks only the power of speech.”

  Her posture is perfect, her shoulders straight, hands folded one across the other. She wears no jewelry, not even a wedding ring. If she reached a hand out, the gesture would seem perfectly natural. Her face is wide at the cheekbones, the forehead high, the chin pointed. Her nose is narrow, her lips pale and closed, the corners turned up ever so slightly in the famous smile. More than the smile, though, it is the eyes that captivate. They are warm, brown, and inescapable.

  Mona Lisa only has eyes for me. There is no other. No one more interesting, more intelligent, more compelling. And what is extraordinary, if a dozen others crowd into this room, each one will feel the same. Each person who looks at her becomes the only person in her world. It is flattering and, at the same time, maddening, because she gives away nothing of herself.

  I close my eyes and imagine that she has vanished.

  2

  THE MYSTERY or MONA LISA that I am pursuing begins in Paris at the end of the Belle Époque, when the city was poised at the cusp of an irreverent new century and an irreverent new art. In the brief avantguerre interlude before trench warfare and unutterable loss, a burst of glorious incandescent energy made the City of Lights electric. Extraordinary young talents in many mediums from many nations trooped to Paris to perform their high-wire acts: the Russians Diaghilev and Stravinsky, the Italian Modigliani, the Spaniards Juan Gris and Pablo Picasso, and the man without a country Guillaume Apollinaire.

  From the ateliers of Montmartre and the cafés of Montparnasse, a radical creative idiom was emerging that would change both art and writing. While Proust was wresting The Remembrance of Things Past from a pile of notes and scribbles, the very sentiment of remembrance was coming under attack. The past was no longer a lesson to be mastered. It was an inhibition to be overcome.

  Paris then was as critical to the future of art as Florence was in the Renaissance, and the preeminent painter of each period—the celebrated master Leonardo da Vinci and the brash young contender Pablo Picasso—became central players in a crime so brazen and so brilliant that it would capture the attention of the world.

  A century later, the mystery lingers, the truth as elusive as the prize. Who stole Mona Lisa?

  THE VANISHING ACT

  LOUIS BÉROUD PAINTING IN THE SALON CARRÉ

  Painter Louis Béroud had been copying Mona Lisa.

  When he returned to complete his painting on

  Tuesday, August 22, 1911, he made a startling discovery.

  (Courtesy of Réunion des Musées Nationaux/Art Resource, New York)

  I

  EARLY IN MAY, with the Hudson glassy beneath a morning haze, an elegant Latin American “marques” stepped off the gangway of the S.S. Mauritania. He carried a Louis Vuitton case. The ship had been delayed for an extra day in quarantine at the mouth of the harbor awaiting clearance. At first light, the Mauritania was released, and like a dowager queen ignoring the minion tugs hauling and chugging, she began a stately glide up the river to a berth on the west bank of Manhattan island.

  No magical skyline emerged through the lavender mist. The year was 1911, before the vertical city was invented. The steel and glass skyscrapers would come later, once Otis's new mechanical lift was accepted as something more than a risky contraption.

  With a tip of his homburg to the ladies gathered on the first-class deck, the marques slipped through the crowd, hastening without seeming to. Impatience makes fools of clever men, and he was careful never to convey the impression of a man in a hurry. In his work, patience and precision were paramount, and he had perfected both virtues, although he was not a virtuous man.

  His passport, which had been issued in Argentina, identified him as Eduardo de Valfierno. Although he had used a dozen of the more common Spanish names, this was the alias that cl
ung. The surname had been conferred by a caustic acquaintance. The title was his own addition. In his passport, every page was stamped with visas, indicating that he was both a man of the world and never long in a single place. The contents of his luggage indicated his occupation.

  The marques passed through New York customs, declaring that he had in his possession one Mona Lisa, and went directly downtown. The Mauritania was his sixth Atlantic crossing in a year, and on each trip, he had carried a Mona Lisa in his Vuitton luggage. He aroused no suspicion. New mechanical methods of printing were making reproductions ubiquitous, and increasingly, travelers were returning from the Grand Tour with copies of masterworks.

  If the customs inspectors had been better versed in the traffic of art or the marques less imposing in his demeanor and dress, he might not have sailed through with such ease, because the Mona Lisa he carried was a wood panel apparently of great age, not a painting on canvas.

  From the rolled brim of his homburg to the tips of his gray doeskin gloves, the Marques de Valfierno appeared to be a gentleman of means and refinement. An imperial bearing and courtly manners gave him a distinction that opened palace gates in Europe and made him an Honoréd guest in the nouveau-riche mansions going up along Fifth Avenue. Envious colleagues groused that “his front was worth a million dollars.”

  By the time the marques reached the financial district, a commotion of horse-drawn hansom cabs, milk wagons, peddlers’ carts, motorized cars from the R. E. Olds Company in Detroit, new Model T Fords, and the first “autostages” with seats for a dozen riders clogged the cobblestone streets. Carrying the Vuitton case, the marques entered the stony sanctuary of a downtown bank. The space was as cavernous as a basilica, the atmosphere hushed. Vaulted ceilings and marble floors bespoke an architecture chosen to inspire faith that capital would be closely guarded and investors’ secrets held fast.

  In the privacy of a windowless room in a safe-deposit vault, he opened the case, removed the painting, and with extreme care, placed it beside five others. Each was a flawless fake—an exact and brilliant forgery.

  That evening the Marques de Valfierno—in translation, “the Marquis of the Gate of Hell”—would dress in white tie and tails and linger over brandy in a private dining room set with white damask, crystal candelabra, and vases of calla lilies. His dinner companion would be a man of substance. Clouded in curls of cigar smoke and eased by the finest wines and champagne, the marques would make his irresistible pitch.

  The scheme itself was a work of art. He would offer, for a kingly price, the most coveted woman in the world. He would confide that his was a rare offer, extended only to the six wealthiest, most discerning men, each a renowned collector of priceless art and beautiful objects. The offer would never be repeated. Whichever man placed the highest bid would win. Although, as a point of honor, he could not be more specific, in the course of the conversation, certain names were mentioned—Morgan, Mellon, Carnegie, Huntington, Altman.

  In the eighteenth century, the English were the “barbarians [who were] buying up everything.”∗1 Now it was the Americans’ turn. Freshly minted millionaires were sweeping across Europe, amassing art with the same lack of scruples that they had amassed fortunes, forming many of the great collections (Frick, Morgan, Carnegie, Mellon, Widener, and Huntington, whose wife described him as “scrupulously dishonest”). For continental conmen like the marques, separating American magnates from their millions had become an art form and lucrative profession. Sharks at home, the Americans were innocents abroad—irresistible targets for every kind of scam. None was more clever or daring than the Mona Lisa caper.

  1911 was a year of grand escapades. In the boatyards of Liverpool, a magnificent new ocean liner was under construction. Its builders boasted that it would be “unsinkable.” In Antarctica, Captain Robert Falcon Scott was trudging across the frozen plateau to the South Pole, the Union Jack folded in his pack, dreaming of making history, and in Paris, a plan was brewing to pinch the most famous painting in the world. Of these three grand escapades, the first seemed assured of success, the second likely, and the third not only improbable but impossible.

  2

  SUNDAY IN THE LOUVRE WITH LISA. Another scorching day in Paris, ninety-five degrees Fahrenheit, no hint of a breeze, no hope of a shower. The air was close, the sun so blazing that even the carriage horses were wearing straw hats. For more than fifty days, temperatures had rarely dropped below ninety degrees. The country beyond Paris was burning. Thatch-roofed farmhouses and acres of parched forest had become tinder, and spontaneous-combustion fires broke out near Poitiers, Orleans, and Beaumont, Albertville, Dijon, and Fontainebleau.

  Within the galleries of the Louvre Museum, even in the late afternoon of August 20, the heat was a physical presence so overwhelming that it trivialized four thousand years of art and history. Maximilien Alphonse Paupardin slumped on his stool in the doorway of the Salon Carré, as sated and overstuffed as a Rembrandt burgher. He was weighed down by the weather and by an unseasonable midday meal. In everything except name, Paupardin was a simple man who felt elevated in a uniform—first in an army uniform and now in the costume of a Louvre guard. A uniform gave him stature, confidence, a defined place in the world. Out of uniform, he felt diminished.

  He was ignorant of the history that surrounded him. He knew nothing of the medieval knights in suits of mail who had staved off Anglo-Norman invaders from the parapets of Fortress Louvre or the lusty young kings, Frangois I and Louis XIV, a Valois and a Bourbon respectively, who, imagining Paris as a new Rome, had turned the Louvre fortress into a palace fit for a Caesar. Paupardin knew only one emperor, the cocky little Corsican and epic pillager, Napoleon Bonaparte.

  On an average day, several hundred visitors would traipse through the galleries—students, artists, foreign travelers, and Frenchmen from the provinces—but visitors were few on this Sunday afternoon at the end of summer. An occasional tourist had wandered through from the Grande Galerie, not staying long enough to arouse the guard's interest or register in his memory. He stirred on his stool, his nap arrested.

  Had a ripple of gas disturbed him, his midday meal returning? Did he catch a sudden whiff of oleander or hear an alien sound? He raised an eyelid. Three “macaroni” were whispering together. The old guard glanced at them with disdain. They were dressed in their Sunday best, black suits and straw boaters, but no suit could disguise what they were—young working-class men who had immigrated to Paris from the mountain towns of northern Italy looking for work and, more often than not, finding trouble.

  There was one other visitor. The boy had returned with flowers. A young Goethe enamored of all things Italian. The guard recognized him, a quintessential German, hair flaxen, eyes ice blue, warmed now by the lust to possess the dark lady. He mooned over her, gazing into her liquid eyes, and she seemed to answer. Eyes are the mirror of the soul, her creator, Leonardo da Vinci, believed.

  Men had been coming to court her for years, bearing flowers, notes, and poems that Paupardin scooped up and tossed out at the end of the day. She accepted their attentions democratically but gave nothing in return, just the same half-smile. She conferred it on all equally. A promise, a tease, a warning. No man could be sure. The lovesick boy would return the next day and the day after.

  Like rival lovers paying suit, the three olive-skinned men watched the German. Bemused? Mocking? Wary? Their faces gleamed as if in rapture, features shining and dissolving in a heat so oppressive that, if The Victory of Samothrace were sculpted of wax, it would dissolve like the wings of Icarus. The flowers the boy proffered were already wilting.

  Paupardin saw the visitors without seeing them, as he saw the paintings without seeing them, the masterpieces of the Louvre collection, each in its place, unchanged for decades. He was anticipating the next day, Monday, his day of rest, when the museum was closed for cleaning and the staff reduced.

  The old guard pulled a soiled handkerchief from his pocket to mop his face, and caught her watching him. She was
smiling as if she knew he had overindulged at noon and dozed on the job. It was the disconcerting smile of a mother or a mistress. He wiped his face to blot her out and sighed with resignation.

  There were no youngsters among the custodians who guarded the patrimony of France. Age and lethargy were job requirements. Only retired noncommissioned officers of the French army could apply to be guards at the Musée du Louvre. The country they had served allowed them one final tour of duty before relegating them to permanent pasture and probable penury. This was their last shuffle, and ambitions rarely if ever strayed beyond a good meal, an afternoon nap, or perhaps a few moments with a grandchild.

  The guard shifted his substantial weight on the insubstantial stool and repressed a belch, regretting his choice of cassoulet, a dinner suitable for a winter Sunday, not the doldrums of August. The afternoon meandered in half-time. By four o'clock, when the bell clanged signaling the museum's closing, the “macaroni” and the young Goethe had disappeared.

  Paupardin picked up the oleander and folded his stool. The Grande and Petite Galeries emptied, footsteps echoing, the many doors banging shut. Outside the Louvre, Paris shimmered in the glaze of heat. In the Tuileries Gardens just beyond, a halfhearted game of boule was ending.

  Summer is not a popular season in Paris. Average August temperatures chase rich and poor to the vineyards of the Loire valley and the cooling beaches of Normandy. This August was the worst that Parisians forced by one circumstance or another to remain in town could remember in a dozen years. The heat wave had hung on for weeks. Less than one millimeter of rain had fallen in Paris during the entire month, and in a single day, four people had collapsed with sunstroke. At six o'clock, it was still ninety-one degrees. The cafés of Pigalle were deserted. The Seine stood still. Along its banks, the sheltering plane trees and chestnut trees drooped.